that's the number of econs tests ive not performed satisfactorily in. 16. twas a wee improvement over the previous test of 13, which was totally, suckcock.
quite disappointed in my performance, considering that i actually studied the day before. and i actually did the damned tutorial. and who the fuck gets 1/4 for a data response question? walau this is some serious shit. 25%. knn.
but not entirely my fault i guess. my new ideas are not accepted by them narrow minded peoples. i guess its not that im not prepared for econs, econs is not prepared for me. damns. ok cookie cutter answers from now on.
pw was junk. to bolster wadeva we had to say, i koped de Coubertin gpp. and so, all her comments were just to tell us what more we have to do for the written report. to this i only have one response: wtftmdknnbccb. well this long chain of expletives best encapsulate how i feel. shit. just brush it up and i think ours is quite good already. yeah.
so gp ct is tomorrow. i dont really know how i would fare. i dont have the acute feeling of success. it lingers in me no more. im screwing up bigtime again. the magic is gone, just like copperfield making the statue of liberty disappear. gone. poof. gone.
the way rjgptutors mark is especially questionable. especially when the ks bull is really full of bullshit. basically the essays pervert the intention of the questions, like transforming some sexual inequality into a bio essay on dimorphism. the arguments hardly had any evidence to back up, although i must say some arguments seriously do not need evidence but tt wuss always demands evidence.
tomorrow be the day
hopefully i do well.
for my compo
and my compre.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment